SAI Global Property Division Pty Ltd v Johnstone  FCA 1333
Employees have ready access to their employer’s confidential information during the course of their employment. For an employee, this information is important in order to carry out their duties but for an exiting employee, they may be tempted to improperly retain confidential information believing it will be useful in their new position.
In our blog earlier this year – “Going...Going...Gone – Terminated Employees and Confidential Information” we highlighted the basic measures that employers can put in place to protect their confidential information. Some measures that we highlighted were for an employer to analyse an exiting employee’s computer in order to identify whether a copy of company confidential information was made and if so, then to take the appropriate action in the courts.
These measures were taken by SAI Global Property Division Pty Ltd (SAI) after its Business Development Manager (the Employee) tendered his resignation and advised that he was going to be joining a competitor in October 2015. Following the announcement, the Employee was reminded of his obligations regarding confidential information and placed on gardening leave for his two week notice period.
SAI was rightly concerned about the Employee’s announcement to join a competitor and arranged for his laptop computer to be forensically examined. This forensic examination found that three days before tendering his resignation, the Employee saved two computer files onto a USB which contained SAI’s confidential and customer information. It was also discovered that the Employee had commenced employment with the new employer whilst he was meant to be on gardening leave.
SAI subsequently commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia and was successful in seeking orders which restrained the Employee from deleting or otherwise destroying SAI’s confidential information and required him to “deliver up” to the Court the confidential information, including any external storage device and computer.
The Employee admitted that he copied the confidential information without permission of SAI and that he knew that it was wrong to do so. The Court also found that:
The Court held that by copying and accessing the confidential documents, the Employee:
The Court made Orders which restrained the Employee from using any of SAI’s confidential information and for the Employee to pay SAI $9,231.00 in damages and $196,416.54 for its legal costs.
In this circumstance, SAI had in place the right protections and took the appropriate measures to seek to protect its confidential information.
It is important that employers put into place measures in order to protect their confidential information and to prevent employees from copying, removing or disclosing confidential information. Such measures include:
Shane Koelmeyer is a leading workplace relations lawyer and Director at Workplace Law. Workplace Law is a specialist law firm providing employers with legal advice, training and representation in all aspects of workplace relations, employment-related matters and WH&S.
02 9256 7500 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Comments are closed for this blog post